Survey of Denver Voters
August 2003
Transition in City Government
Let me ask a few questions concerning the new city administration in Denver.
So far, how would you rate the transition from the Webb to Hickenlooper administration? Would you rate it excellent, good fair or poor?
. |
Excellent |
21% |
Good |
41% |
Fair |
14% |
Poor |
2% |
Don't know/refused |
22% |
|
|
In general, do you approve or disapprove of Mayor Hickenloopers new appointments to the cabinet and senior positions in his administration?
. |
Approve |
58% |
Disapprove |
5% |
Don't know/refused |
37% |
|
|
What do you believe is the most important issue for Mayor Hickenlooper and the Denver City Council to deal with?
. |
Budget/fiscal problems |
37% |
Economy/jobs |
27% |
Education/poor schools |
6% |
Police problems/shootings |
4% |
Employee wages |
3% |
Poor government management |
3% |
Taxes too high |
2% |
Traffic congestion/roads |
2% |
Crime/gangs |
1% |
Too much growth |
1% |
Other (Health care, library, water, drought) |
6% |
Don't know/refused |
8% |
|
|
Ballot Questions
Thinking about the November election, the following issue may be on the November 2003 election ballot in Denver. Please tell me if as of today you strongly support the proposal, somewhat support, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose the proposal.
A ballot issue sponsored by the mayor and city council to change the Denver city charter concerning salary and benefits for elected officials and employees. Several pages of rules and regulations would be reduced to a few paragraphs. The goal would be to make the rules more flexible and save money in compensation and benefits.
|
. |
Summary |
Strongly support |
37% |
|
Support |
68% |
Somewhat support |
31% |
|
Experience |
17% |
Somewhat oppose |
8% |
|
Honest/ethics |
15% |
Strongly oppose |
9% |
|
|
|
Don't know/refused |
15% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Changes
Thinking about the changes in the Denver City Charter concerning the employment compensation of Denver elected officials and city employees, as I read you each of the following statements about the proposed changes please tell me if its a very good idea, good idea, a not very good idea or a very bad idea. (Rotated)
. |
|
Very
Good
Idea |
Good
Idea |
Not
Good
Idea |
Bad
Idea |
Don't
Know |
Limit raises of city council and the mayor to either the rate of inflation or average raise of regular city employees, whichever is lower |
46% |
38% |
5% |
4% |
8% |
Remove Denver charter language requiring automatic pay raises for city employees |
37% |
31% |
12% |
12% |
8% |
Create a more flexible merit-based system that can reward efficient and harder working employees with bonuses |
46% |
34% |
6% |
7% |
7% |
|
|
|
Summary of Charter Changes. |
|
Very good/
good idea |
Not Good/
bad idea |
Limit elected officials raises |
84% |
9% |
Bonuses for employees |
80% |
13% |
End automatic pay raises |
68% |
24% |
|
|
|
As I read the following two statements concerning the Denver City Charter please tell me which one comes closest to your view:
- The Denver City Charter section concerning employee rules for conditions of compensation and benefits should not be changed. Current City Charter rules are needed to protect employees from on-the-job politics and to properly compensate employees for their hard work. The changes proposed are just too extreme,
or
- The Denver City Charter section concerning employee rules for compensation and benefits should be changed to save money, increase flexibility in setting salaries and benefits, improve efficiency and provide merit incentives to harder working employees. During hard economic times it is necessary to have flexibility in setting salaries and benefits to avoid layoffs and service reductions.
. |
Statement A |
17% |
Statement B |
73% |
Don't know/refused |
10% |
|
|
Ratings
I would like your views on some political leaders. As I read the following list of political leaders, please tell me your impression of each one as either very favorable, somewhat favorable, somewhat unfavorable or very unfavorable. If you arent familiar with a name, or dont have an opinion, just say so. (Rotated)
|
|
. |
Very
Favorable |
Somewhat
Favorable |
Somewhat
Unfavorable |
Very
Unfavorable |
No
Opinion |
Don't know |
Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper |
34% |
38% |
3% |
2% |
17% |
7% |
Governor Bill Owens |
22% |
33% |
19% |
23% |
2% |
1% |
Auditor Dennis Gallagher |
10% |
25% |
4% |
3% |
33% |
24% |
State Attorney General Ken Salazar |
21% |
45% |
6% |
2% |
14% |
12% |
Former Mayor Wellington Webb |
17% |
39% |
20% |
18% |
4% |
1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of Political Leader Rating |
|
Very/somewhat
favorable |
Very/somewhat
unfavorable |
Don't know |
Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper |
72% |
5% |
24% |
State Attorney General Ken Salazar |
66% |
8% |
26% |
Former Mayor Wellington Webb |
56% |
38% |
5% |
Governor Bill Owens |
55% |
42% |
3% |
Auditor Dennis Gallagher |
35% |
7% |
57% |
|
|
|
|
Thinking about job performance, as I read the following list of Denver agencies and groups please tell me if you believe each one is doing an excellent, good, fair or poor job. (Rotated)
. |
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
Don't
Know |
Denver Public Library |
41% |
42% |
6% |
2% |
10% |
Denver Police Department |
11% |
46% |
33% |
8% |
2% |
Denver Public Schools |
6% |
30% |
36% |
17% |
11% |
Denver City Council |
2% |
27% |
36% |
9% |
25% |
Denver Fire Department |
37% |
54% |
6% |
-- |
4% |
Denver city employees |
6% |
42% |
31% |
7% |
13% |
|
|
|
Summary of Denver Agency/Group Performance
|
|
Excellent/
Good
|
Fair/
Poor |
Don't
Know |
Denver Public Library |
91% |
6% |
4% |
Denver Police Department |
83% |
8% |
10% |
Denver Public Schools |
57% |
41% |
2% |
Denver City Council |
48% |
38% |
13% |
Denver Fire Department |
36% |
53% |
11% |
Denver city employees |
29% |
45% |
25% |
|
|
|
Research Design
|
- Telephone survey of 500 Denver adult registered voters from July 31-August 6, 2003. The survey was conducted by Ciruli Associates for Denver Public Library. Funding from private donations through the DPL Commissions Special Trust Fund.
- Respondents were selected from a random sample of statewide registered voters who voted in the 2000 presidential election or are newly registered since November 2000. Statistical range of accuracy in 19 out of 20 cases is ±4.4 percentage points for a sample size of 500. Sample tolerances for subgroups are larger.
- Due to rounding, not all totals equal 100 percent. Survey results can be affected by other factors such as question wording and order.
- Ciruli Associates is a non-partisan research, communication and public policy firm providing consulting for Colorado and national organizations since 1976.
|
. |
[top] [archives] [home] [send this page to a friend] |